Update: U2 – Stick to the Music!
Sep 6, 2010 Copyright, File Sharing, Government, Net Neutrality, Privacy
Leave a comment
Back in January 2010, we criticised U2 front man Bono for warning all creative types to beware of the evils of the Internet and especially us greedy ISP types when it came to illegal file sharing. We recommended Bono should stick to singing.
- opinion.enta.net: Bono – Stick to Singing
Darren Farnden, Head of Marketing
It would appear that U2’s manager, Paul McGuinness, didn’t read our opinion as he’s now thrown in his two cents worth of comment within the August issue of GQ magazine. In it he also slams ISPs for “decimating the music industry” and profiteering from online file sharing, whilst also being the cause of recorded music sales falling.
- gq-magazine.co.uk: How to save the music industry
Like Bono, Mr. McGuinness believes illegal file sharing is the reason for ISPs’ increasing profit margins by suggesting “free content has helped fuel the vast profits of the technology and telecoms industries”. However, as we stated in our original Opinion article ‘Bono – Stick to Singing’ (opinion.enta.net: Bono – Stick to singing), in reality broadband customers continue to demand the fastest broadband at the lowest price which squeezes ISPs’ margins. Those of us within the Internet industry will also know that it is actually more costly to support such infringers due to the extra bandwidth they consume. Our increasing revenues are more likely to be down to the innovative new technologies we deploy and the additional services we provide to add value to customers’ experience. Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: Copyright, File Sharing, Government, Net Neutrality, Privacy
(5 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ...Google: From advocate to adversary?
Aug 24, 2010 Business, Digital Divide, Government, Net Neutrality
Leave a comment
The ongoing international debate over net neutrality has been thrown into the limelight once again. This time its news of an unlikely partnership between Google, the once vocal advocates of net neutrality, and Verizon.
Neil Watson, Head of Operations
News broke regarding a ‘deal’ between Google and Verizon which would see the two companies put together a proposal for the tackling of net neutrality in the US. At first glance the two titans appear to support net neutrality and agree with previous plans from the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) ensuring all providers are transparent about the management of their networks and prohibit discrimination against certain types of legal content.
“In providing broadband Internet access service, a provider would be prohibited from engaging in undue discrimination against any lawful Internet content, application, or service in a manner that causes meaningful harm to competition or to users. Prioritization of Internet traffic would be presumed inconsistent with the non-discrimination standard, but the presumption could be rebutted.” Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: Business, Digital Divide, Government, Net Neutrality
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...Is this the beginning of the end for the Great Aussie Firewall?
Jun 29, 2010 Government, Net Neutrality, Regulation
Leave a comment
For several years now Stephen Conroy, Australia’s Communications Minister, has been waging war against the evils of the Internet with his proposed net filtering legislation aimed at forcing Australian ISPs to censor the web. As you may expect, he has come up against a significant amount of opposition from ISPs, freedom of speech advocates, the industry, politicians and the like.
Elsa Chen, General Manager
Possibly most damning of all is the latest report out of Australia which brands the proposed legislation as “politically toxic”. This is not good news for Mr Conroy as he plans to introduce this highly controversial Bill before the next General Election in October.
So what’s wrong with the Great Aussie Firewall?
The ‘Great Aussie Firewall’, as it has been nicknamed, was originally proposed and positioned as a method of tackling child pornography on the Internet and was expected to operate in a similar way to our own IWF watch list, with ISPs blocking access to potentially harmful or offensive sites. Nothing wrong with that you may argue. However, there are two significant differences between the Aussie Firewall and our own IWF list. Firstly, our IWF list is not mandatory or state run and secondly, the scope of the Australian filter is far more wide reaching. This is the real concern for many opposing the Bill. The Australian filter is based on the RC Content (Refused Classification) list which is compiled by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). Opponents to the proposed Bill state that only one third of the list is actually made up of child abuse content. The rest, according to the ACMA, includes bestiality, sexual violence, detailed instruction in crime, violence or drug use and/or material that advocates the doing of a terrorist act. However its opponents insist that the list extends beyond these. Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: Government, Net Neutrality, Regulation
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...Poll:What do you think about Google’s withdrawal from China?
Apr 13, 2010 Net Neutrality, Polls, Regulation
Leave a comment
We recently published an article discussing Google’s withdrawal from China (Entanet Opinion: Google flees Great Firewall of China) and the impact this has on the Internet industry, Google and what it means for other countries currently implementing censorship policies. Now we would like to find out what you think about this issue and have published a new poll to do just that.
Tags: Net Neutrality, Polls, Regulation
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...Google flees Great Firewall of China
Apr 6, 2010 Business, Net Neutrality, Regulation, Security
Leave a comment
Back in December 2009 Google and a number of other high profile companies were the target of several cyber attacks which were allegedly traced back to the Chinese government. In Google’s case the hackers appeared to be after the Gmail account details of a number of human rights advocates. We started to cover this story in January when Google announced that it was considering withdrawing its Google.cn operations following the attacks.
Neil Watson, Head of Operations
- Entanet Opinion: Google finally stands up to China
On its company blog, Google stated “We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that “we will carefully monitor conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China.”
- Google Blog: A new approach to China
Tags: Business, Net Neutrality, Regulation, Security
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...
Cat on 
cjp on 
Loading ...